USCG Administrative Law Judge Case
U.S. Coast Guard vs. Glen Dauphin
The March 31, 2023 Contested addressed the Coast Guard allegation summarized as: Security Risk. The case outcome is recorded as Settlement Agreement.
Disposition
Settlement Agreement
Posture
Unknown
Sanction
—
Judge
Walter Brudzinski
What the Record Shows
Case Summary
The Coast Guard charged or alleged Glen Dauphin with security risk.
The March 31, 2023 Contested is tied to docket 2023-0014, Enforcement Activity Number 7542603, disposition: Settlement Agreement.
The docket metadata records the findings as: Settled.
The recorded outcome or sanction is Settlement Agreement.
Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.
Outcome
Settled
Case Timeline
Mar 31, 2023
Contested
Loaded source record for 2023-0014.
Case Metadata
- Docket Number
- 2023-0014
- Enforcement Activity Number
- 7542603
- Judge
- Walter Brudzinski
- Source Era
- 2023–Present Docket Era
- Dispositive Order Type
- Contested
- Allegation
- Security Risk
Sources, Context, and Method
What This Record Does and Does Not Show
Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.
A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.
MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.
Suggest a Correction
See something that needs correction?
MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.