USCG Administrative Law Judge Case
U.S. Coast Guard vs. Jay Carl Heichelheim
The available record says the Coast Guard charged or alleged Jay Carl Heichelheim with use of dangerous drugs. The case outcome is recorded as Withdrawn.
Disposition
Withdrawn
Posture
Dismissal
Sanction
—
Judge
—
What the Record Shows
Case Summary
The Coast Guard charged or alleged Jay Carl Heichelheim with use of dangerous drugs.
The October 30, 2023 case record is tied to docket 2023-0382, procedural posture: Dismissal, disposition: Withdrawn.
The available record identifies the case as dismissed or withdrawn, so the allegations should not be described as proved unless a separate source says that.
The recorded outcome or sanction is Withdrawn.
Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.
Outcome
Withdrawn
Case Timeline
Oct 30, 2023
Withdrawal
Loaded source record for 2023-0382.
Case Metadata
- Docket Number
- 2023-0382
- Enforcement Activity Number
- —
- Judge
- —
- Source Era
- 2023–Present Docket Era
- Dispositive Order Type
- Withdrawal
- Allegation
- Use of Dangerous Drugs
Sources, Context, and Method
What This Record Does and Does Not Show
Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.
A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.
MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.
Suggest a Correction
See something that needs correction?
MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.