MLAA
LATEST
Back to Docket Search

USCG Administrative Law Judge Case

U.S. Coast Guard vs. United States Coast Guar-D

The February 21, 2023 Admission addressed the Coast Guard allegation summarized as: Negligence. The case outcome is recorded as Admitted.

Disposition

Unknown

Posture

Unknown

Sanction

Judge

What the Record Shows

Case Summary

The Coast Guard charged or alleged UNITED STATES COAST GUAR-D with negligence.

The February 21, 2023 Admission is tied to docket 2023-0071, Enforcement Activity Number 7616690.

The recorded outcome or sanction is Admitted.

Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.

Outcome

Admitted

Case Timeline

  1. Feb 21, 2023

    Admission

    Loaded source record for 2023-0071.

Case Metadata

Docket Number
2023-0071
Enforcement Activity Number
7616690
Dispositive Order Date
Feb 21, 2023
Dispositive order
Judge
Source Era
2023–Present Docket Era
Dispositive Order Type
Admission
Allegation
Negligence

Sources, Context, and Method

What This Record Does and Does Not Show

Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.

A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.

MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.

Suggest a Correction

See something that needs correction?

MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.