MLAA
LATEST
Back to Docket Search

USCG Administrative Law Judge Case

U.S. Coast Guard vs. Richard J. Tietge

In U.S. Coast Guard vs. Richard J. Tietge, docket CG S&R 06-0286, the Coast Guard filed a complaint on June 12, 2006 seeking suspension of Tietge’s Merchant Mariner’s Document. The settlement agreement states that the case involved Kitsap County Superior Court case #06-00286-3 and a Class C felony conviction for possession of depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct under RCW 9.68A.070. Judge Peter A. Fitzpatrick approved the settlement on July 13, 2006. The settlement required at least 12 months outright suspension beginning March 24, 2006, plus any additional time needed to satisfy court-imposed community custody and rehabilitation conditions, with revocation if Tietge failed to complete the conditions. A December 10, 2007 Notice of Completion states Tietge completed the prescribed training, his credential was returned, and the suspension period ran from March 24, 2006 through December 10, 2007.

Disposition

Settlement Agreement

Posture

Settlement

Sanction

Credential suspension from March 24, 2006 to December 10, 2007; revocation if settlement conditions were not completed

Judge

Peter A. Fitzpatrick

What the Record Shows

Case Summary

In the complaint served against Richard J. Tietge, the Coast Guard initiated an administrative proceeding seeking suspension of his Merchant Mariner’s Document. The settlement agreement identifies the underlying court matter as Kitsap County Superior Court case #06-00286-3 and describes it as a Class C felony conviction for possession of depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct under RCW 9.68A.070.

The settlement papers state that Tietge entered the agreement solely to resolve the matter and did not admit liability for the claims in the complaint. They state that he admitted the jurisdictional allegations, but neither admitted nor denied the factual allegations. Tietge waived hearing and appeal rights.

On July 13, 2006, Administrative Law Judge Peter A. Fitzpatrick approved the settlement agreement. The settlement required a mitigated suspension-and-revocation penalty: a minimum of 12 months outright suspension of Tietge’s Merchant Mariner’s Document beginning March 24, 2006, followed by additional outright suspension time if needed to fully satisfy community-custody and rehabilitation conditions imposed by the court. The agreement required Tietge to deposit his MMD with Sector Seattle Investigations, not work in a capacity requiring an MMD during the deposit period, sign releases for probation and other records, advise Sector Seattle of address or telephone changes, and submit evidence of successful completion. If he failed to satisfy the conditions by July 1, 2008, the agreement provided that his document would be revoked; if he successfully completed the conditions, the document would be returned and the record would show an outright suspension for at least one year from March 24, 2006 plus any additional time required by the agreement.

A December 10, 2007 Notice of Completion of Settlement Agreement states that Tietge supplied evidence of successful performance of training, the Coast Guard accepted that evidence, and his credential had been returned. The notice states that his credential-suspension period was from March 24, 2006 until December 10, 2007, when he completed the prescribed training and his license was returned.

Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.

Outcome

Settlement agreement approved. Tietge admitted jurisdictional allegations, neither admitted nor denied factual allegations, and later completed prescribed training according to the Coast Guard notice of completion.

Sanction: Credential suspension from March 24, 2006 to December 10, 2007; revocation if settlement conditions were not completed

Duration: March 24, 2006 to December 10, 2007

Case Timeline

  1. Mar 24, 2006

    Suspension period began

    The completion notice states Tietge’s credential suspension ran from March 24, 2006.

  2. Jun 12, 2006

    Complaint filed

    The motion for approval states that the Coast Guard filed a complaint seeking suspension of Tietge’s Merchant Mariner’s Document.

  3. Jul 8, 2006

    Settlement signed by respondent

    Tietge signed the settlement agreement in July 2006.

  4. Jul 13, 2006

    Consent order approved

    Judge Peter A. Fitzpatrick approved the settlement agreement.

  5. Dec 10, 2007

    Notice of completion

    The Coast Guard accepted evidence of successful completion, returned the credential, and entered the final suspension period.

Case Metadata

Docket Number
CG S&R 06-0286
Enforcement Activity Number
2658171
Dispositive Order Date
Dec 10, 2007
Dispositive order
Source Era
1999–2022 Published Decisions
Dispositive Order Type
Notice of Completion of Settlement Agreement / Consent Order Approving Settlement Agreement
Allegation
Sexual Misconduct; Conviction / NDRA; Misconduct; Credential / MMC
Source wording: The settlement agreement identifies a Class C felony conviction for possession of depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct under RCW 9.68A.070.
Alleged conduct dates: 2006-03-24
Authorities Cited
33 C.F.R. § 20.502RCW 9.68A.070
Coast Guard Representative
Ronald C. Kinsey Jr., Investigating Officer, USCG Sector Seattle
Mariner / Respondent Counsel

Richard J. Tietge

Respondent; no counsel identified in loaded settlement papers / Settlement Agreement / Jul 8, 2006

Sources, Context, and Method

What This Record Does and Does Not Show

Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.

A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.

MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.

Suggest a Correction

See something that needs correction?

MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.