USCG Administrative Law Judge Case
U.S. Coast Guard vs. Thomas Hely
The available docket record identifies this ALJ case involving THOMAS HELY, but the loaded source data is too sparse to summarize the underlying allegations or outcome beyond the case metadata.
Disposition
Unknown
Posture
Unknown
Sanction
—
Judge
—
What the Record Shows
Case Summary
The available docket record identifies this Coast Guard ALJ proceeding involving THOMAS HELY, but the loaded source data does not include detailed allegation language.
The available record is tied to docket 2024-0585.
The loaded source data does not state a clearer final sanction or disposition, so this page should remain brief until a reviewer adds source-supported outcome detail.
Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.
Outcome
No findings summary has been loaded yet.
Case Metadata
- Docket Number
- 2024-0585
- Enforcement Activity Number
- —
- Dispositive Order Date
- Undated
- Judge
- —
- Source Era
- 2023–Present Docket Era
- Dispositive Order Type
- —
- Allegation
- —
Sources, Context, and Method
What This Record Does and Does Not Show
Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.
A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.
MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.
Suggest a Correction
See something that needs correction?
MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.
