USCG Administrative Law Judge Case
U.S. Coast Guard vs. James Fredericks
According to public Coast Guard docket records, the Coast Guard opened an administrative S&R case involving mariner James Fredericks, with the docket listing “Sexual Assault & Misconduct” as the allegation. The public docket currently identifies the S&R case as pending, so this page should treat the allegation as unresolved in this proceeding unless a later public order resolves it.
Disposition
Unknown
Posture
Unknown
Sanction
—
Judge
—
What the Record Shows
Case Summary
The Coast Guard charged or alleged JAMES FREDERICKS with sexual assault and misconduct.
The available record is tied to docket 2024-0465.
The recorded outcome or sanction is Pending.
Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.
Outcome
No findings summary has been loaded yet.
Case Metadata
- Docket Number
- 2024-0465
- Enforcement Activity Number
- —
- Dispositive Order Date
- Undated
- Judge
- —
- Source Era
- 2023–Present Docket Era
- Dispositive Order Type
- —
- Allegation
- Sexual Assault & Misconduct
Sources, Context, and Method
What This Record Does and Does Not Show
Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.
A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.
MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.
Suggest a Correction
See something that needs correction?
MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.