MLAA
LATEST
Back to Docket Search

USCG Administrative Law Judge Case

U.S. Coast Guard vs. Fradarius Smith

The Coast Guard docket 2024-0413 listed the allegation against Fradarius Smith as “Sexual Harassment”. In the September 17, 2024 Consent Order, the ALJ approved a settlement agreement, resolving the credential proceeding without a public hearing decision finding the allegation proved or a public admission by Fradarius Smith.

Disposition

Settlement Agreement

Posture

Settlement

Sanction

Judge

What the Record Shows

Case Summary

The Coast Guard docket 2024-0413 listed the allegation against Fradarius Smith as “Sexual Harassment”.

The ALJ approved the parties' settlement agreement in the September 17, 2024 Consent Order. The settlement posture matters because it can resolve an S&R credential proceeding without a public hearing decision finding the allegation proved and without a public admission by Fradarius Smith, unless the agreement itself says otherwise.

The recorded outcome is Settled.

Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.

Outcome

Settled

Case Timeline

  1. Sep 17, 2024

    Consent Order

    Loaded source record for 2024-0413.

Case Metadata

Docket Number
2024-0413
Enforcement Activity Number
Dispositive Order Date
Sep 17, 2024
Judge
Source Era
2023–Present Docket Era
Dispositive Order Type
Consent Order
Allegation
Sexual Harassment

Sources, Context, and Method

What This Record Does and Does Not Show

Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.

A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.

MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.

Suggest a Correction

See something that needs correction?

MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.