MLAA
LATEST
Back to Docket Search

USCG Administrative Law Judge Case

U.S. Coast Guard vs. David Roy Shakespeare

The March 22, 2017 case record addressed the Coast Guard allegation summarized as: 3 Counts of Misconduct. The case outcome is recorded as Proved.

Disposition

Revocation

Posture

Hearing / Decision

Sanction

Judge

What the Record Shows

Case Summary

The Coast Guard charged or alleged David Roy Shakespeare with 3 Counts of Misconduct.

The March 22, 2017 case record is tied to docket 2016-0275, procedural posture: Hearing Decision, disposition: Revocation.

The recorded outcome or sanction is Proved.

Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.

Outcome

Proved

Case Timeline

  1. Mar 22, 2017

    Revocation

    Loaded source record for 2016-0275.

Case Metadata

Docket Number
2016-0275
Enforcement Activity Number
Dispositive Order Date
Mar 22, 2017
Dispositive order
Judge
Source Era
1999–2022 Published Decisions
Dispositive Order Type
Revocation
Allegation
3 Counts of Misconduct

Sources, Context, and Method

What This Record Does and Does Not Show

Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.

A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.

MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.

Suggest a Correction

See something that needs correction?

MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.