USCG Administrative Law Judge Case
U.S. Coast Guard vs. Paul v. Uccello
The July 20, 2004 Order Revoking License for Failure to Comply with Settlement Agreement addressed the Coast Guard allegation summarized as: Use of Dangerous Drugs. The case outcome is recorded as Failed to meet requirements for random drug testing.
Disposition
Settlement Agreement
Posture
Appeal
Sanction
—
Judge
—
What the Record Shows
Case Summary
The Coast Guard charged or alleged Paul V. Uccello with use of dangerous drugs.
The July 20, 2004 Order Revoking License for Failure to Comply with Settlement Agreement is tied to docket 2002-0208, procedural posture: Appeal, disposition: Settlement Agreement.
The available record identifies an appeal posture, so the case page should focus on the reviewing decision and avoid expanding beyond the issues stated in that source.
The recorded outcome or sanction is Failed to meet requirements for random drug testing.
Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.
Outcome
Failed to meet requirements for random drug testing
Case Timeline
Jul 20, 2004
Order Revoking License for Failure to Comply with Settlement Agreement
Loaded source record for 2002-0208.
Case Metadata
- Docket Number
- 2002-0208
- Enforcement Activity Number
- —
- Judge
- —
- Source Era
- 1999–2022 Published Decisions
- Dispositive Order Type
- Order Revoking License for Failure to Comply with Settlement Agreement
- Allegation
- Use of Dangerous Drugs
Sources, Context, and Method
What This Record Does and Does Not Show
Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.
A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.
MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.
Suggest a Correction
See something that needs correction?
MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.