MLAA
LATEST
Back to Docket Search

USCG Administrative Law Judge Case

U.S. Coast Guard vs. Stephen Bacon Smith

The available Commandant Decision on Appeal 2109 record for Stephen Bacon Smith identifies an archived Coast Guard appeal proceeding and records the outcome as Appeal Decision.

Disposition

Appeal Decision

Posture

Appeal

Sanction

Judge

What the Record Shows

Case Summary

The available record for Stephen Bacon Smith is an archived Coast Guard Commandant Decision on Appeal, CDOA 2109.

The loaded case fields identify the appeal outcome or related case result as Appeal Decision.

Based on public docket metadata and available source documents. Allegations are described as allegations, not findings of fact or admissions.

Outcome

No findings summary has been loaded yet.

Case Timeline

  1. Jul 18, 1977

    Commandant Decision on Appeal 2109

    Loaded source record for 1977-CDOA-2109.

Case Metadata

CDOA Record
1977-CDOA-2109
CDOA Appeal Number
2109
Enforcement Activity Number
Dispositive Order Date
Jul 18, 1977
Dispositive order
Judge
Source Era
CDOA Archive Appeal Record
Dispositive Order Type
Allegation

Sources, Context, and Method

What This Record Does and Does Not Show

Coast Guard suspension and revocation cases are administrative proceedings about a merchant mariner credential. They generally begin when a Coast Guard investigating officer files a complaint with the ALJ Docketing Center. Unless the case goes to a hearing and an ALJ finds the complaint allegations proved in a written decision and order, the allegations should be understood as allegations, not findings.

A settlement agreement or consent order can end the proceeding without an admission of the alleged conduct. This page therefore separates what the Coast Guard alleged from what an ALJ, Commandant appeal decision, default order, settlement order, dismissal, or other public record actually decided.

MLAA builds these pages from public Coast Guard ALJ docket data, official Coast Guard source documents, preserved docket-source proof, and available orders or decisions. We preserve source records where we can, label allegations as allegations, avoid treating docket categories as factual findings, and invite source-backed corrections when a record needs to be fixed.

Suggest a Correction

See something that needs correction?

MLAA builds this docket from public records and source documents. If a name, date, docket number, summary, or document link appears wrong, please send us the correction and any source that helps verify it.